Case inventory: Which officials and units have been notified by CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection to interfere with the inspection?
People’s Daily Online, Beijing, July 12 The website of the Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection reported on the 11th that Chang Xiaobing, the former party secretary and chairman of China Telecom Group Company, was expelled from the Party membership and public office, and his disciplinary problems included serious violation of political discipline and interference with the special inspection work of the central government. According to the investigation, since the implementation of the Regulations on Inspection Work in the Communist Party of China (CPC) in August, 2015, except Chang Xiaobing, CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has notified many officials and units of cases of obstructing and interfering with the central inspection work.
Deputy Secretary of the former Party Group of China Southern Airlines Group Corporation,General manager si xianmin
Notification time: February 3, 2016
Notification content: After investigation, Si Xianmin seriously violated political discipline, interfered with the inspection work, and seriously violated the spirit of the eight central regulations, playing golf with public funds. Serious violation of organizational discipline, failure to truthfully report personal matters as required, serious violation of integrity discipline, accepting gifts and cash gifts, using his authority to seek benefits for others, and his son accepting property and using his authority to seek benefits for relatives’ business activities. Approving the company to pay public funds to others in violation of regulations. Take advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and accept property in business operations. Among them, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and accepting property is suspected of accepting bribes.
Zhou Laizhen, former member and deputy director of the Civil Aviation Administration of China
Notification time: January 19, 2016
Contents of the notification: After investigation, Zhou Laizhen seriously violated political discipline, interfered with and hindered the inspection work, and resisted the organization review; Serious violation of organizational discipline, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits and accept property for others in the selection and appointment of cadres, illegally intervening in personnel arrangements of relevant units, failing to hand in personal passports and truthfully reporting personal matters as required; Seriously violating the discipline of honesty, handing over the expenses that should be paid by individuals to subordinate units or others, accepting gifts and cash gifts, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for relatives’ business activities, and engaging in power trading; Serious violation of the spirit of the eight central regulations, illegal possession and use of golf cards, acceptance of over-standard public banquets, and acceptance of tours arranged by subordinate units; Seriously violating work discipline and changing the route without authorization during going abroad; Take advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and accept property in business operations. Among them, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and accepting property is suspected of accepting bribes.
Deng Qilin, former Party Secretary and Chairman of WISCO Group
Notification time: January 8, 2016
Contents of the notification: After investigation, Deng Qilin seriously violated political discipline, interfered with and hindered the inspection work, opposed organizational review, and engaged in superstitious activities for a long time; Serious violation of organizational discipline, illegal selection and appointment of cadres, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits and accept property for others in the selection and appointment of cadres, failing to truthfully report personal matters according to regulations, and failing to truthfully explain problems to the organization when talking; Serious violation of integrity discipline, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and accept property in business operations, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for relatives’ business activities, occupying houses in violation of regulations, receiving bonuses in violation of regulations, and occupying hotel rooms for personal use for a long time; Seriously violate the discipline of the masses, work discipline and life discipline, and trade power and sex. Among them, taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and accepting property are suspected of accepting bribes.
Hu Zhengming, former director of the Party Committee Office of China Export Credit Insurance Corporation.
Notification time: November 21, 2015
Informed content: After investigation, Comrade Hu Zhengming interfered with the special inspection work of the company by the Central Inspection Team during its stationing in the company, which constituted a violation of the discipline of the Central Inspection Team and the party’s political discipline. In order to enforce the Party’s discipline, according to the relevant provisions of the Regulations on Patrol Work in the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions in the Communist Party of China (CPC), Comrade Hu Zhengming was given a serious warning in the Party and transferred from the post of office director of the Party Committee.
Wu Changshun, former director of Tianjin Public Security Bureau.
Notification time: August 20, 2015
The website of the Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection disclosed in the sixth interpretation of the Regulations on Inspection Work in the Communist Party of China (CPC) published on August 20th, 2015 that during the inspection in Tianjin, the Fifth Inspection Team of the Central Committee fought with Wu Changshun, then vice chairman of the Tianjin Municipal Political Consultative Conference and director of the Public Security Bureau, not only to guard against being monitored and leaked information, but also to find ways to ensure the safety of informants.
Individual units of China Eastern Airlines Group
Notification time: October 18, 2015
When the Ninth Inspection Team of the Central Committee gave feedback to China Eastern Airlines Group on the special inspection, it pointed out that some party organizations did not have a strong sense of the party, and the management of the party was not strict. The implementation of the "two responsibility" was not in place, and individual units had to interfere with the inspection work, and individual leaders violated organizational discipline.
In January, 2016, when China Eastern Airlines Group Company reported the inspection and rectification, it said that the Party Secretary of a subsidiary that had interfered with the inspection work would be dismissed from his post within the party, and the Party Secretary of the marketing department of the company would be dismissed from his post within the party, subject to administrative demotion. Both of them made written inspections and conducted informed criticism within the group.
zhengzhou railway bureau
Notification time: August 20, 2015
The website of the Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection disclosed in the sixth interpretation of the Regulations on Inspection Work in the Communist Party of China (CPC) published on August 20, 2015 that when the Eighth Inspection Team of the Central Committee went to Zhengzhou Railway Bureau to understand the situation, it asked its office to provide reception accounts. The unit provided a batch of vouchers to the inspection team, including more than 400 vouchers of more than 2,000 yuan and more than 100 vouchers of more than 3,500 yuan. With such a large amount and so many times, how many people eat each meal and what do they eat? The inspection team requested relevant materials. The unit refused to provide it, saying that it could not be found, the work notebook was destroyed and the menu could not be provided. The inspection team found the party secretary and director and asked them to perform their main responsibilities to investigate this. It turns out that all the documents provided earlier are false. It turned out that the reception department knew that the inspection team was coming. In order to cover up the serious extravagance and waste, it was suggested to handle the accounts and break them into parts. A large account was processed into several small accounts, and the relevant business departments were asked to fabricate the eating experience. According to the investigation, they spent more than 13,000 yuan on a meal, and the cost of drinks alone was more than 9,000 yuan.
On August 11th, according to the situation and clues discovered by the inspection team, the party group of China Railway Corporation held a video teleconference to report the recent investigation and punishment of 13 mental problems of leading cadres violating the eight central regulations. Among them, Zhang Junbang, former director of Zhengzhou Railway Bureau, was given a serious warning within the party for seriously exceeding the standard of official reception and eating and drinking public funds, and Yang Weijun, secretary of the Party Committee of Zhengzhou Railway Bureau, was given a warning within the party for failing to conscientiously perform the main responsibility of building a clean and honest party style.
> > relevant regulations:
Regulations of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Municipality on Inspection Work
(August 3, 2015)
Thirty-seventh patrol area (unit) and its staff in any of the following circumstances, depending on the seriousness of the case, the main person in charge of the leadership of the area (unit) or other relevant responsible personnel, to give criticism and education, organizational treatment or disciplinary action; Suspected of a crime, transferred to judicial organs according to law:
(a) concealing or deliberately providing false information to the inspection team;
(2) refusing or failing to provide relevant documents and materials to the inspection team as required;
(three) instigating or forcing the relevant units or personnel to interfere with or obstruct the inspection work, or falsely accusing or framing others;
(4) refusing to correct the existing problems without justifiable reasons or failing to make rectification as required;
(5) Strike, retaliate against or frame up cadres and the masses who reflect the problems;
(six) other circumstances that interfere with the inspection work.